Imran Khan 2.0
ISLAMABAD: In a remarkable development, in the case of NAB prosecutor Nawaz Sharif, a specialist expert – NAB has not requested the government head of the NAB government to appeal against the High Court Offer proof Announcing the responsible court verdict, the organization said that the organization could not demonstrate the allegations of debate and fatal nature against the previous head administrator.
According to Deputy Deputy Deputy Deputy, “The decision of interest can be filed within 10 years of announcement of decision, but we can not record it alone.” Is.” Prosecutor General (DPG) Sardar Muzaffar told Khabar.
Under the NAB law, the agency has got discrimination to push this piece of decision, but a specialist has chosen to not be interested in this tale.
In a meeting with the news, Muzaffar Abbasi said that Nawaz Sharif has been convicted under Section 9 (A) (v) of the NAB Ordinance, because he could not record the assets to buy London Pad and its meaning I also increase. Under the NAB Law of Debt and Backward Methods.
Muzaffar acknowledged that under the section 9 (a) (iv), the charge of abortion was excessively a part of the NAB charge sheet against the NAB, but the court did not let it go out.
On this occasion, when it was pointed out that the Supreme Court 9 (a) (v) had been held in excess of the recent verdict after the Supreme Court, commissioning the fault of any property associated with it Should be They did not translate these decisions to the media as part of the media with Section 9 (a) (v) with Section 9 (a) (vi) and Section 9 (A) (iv) interviewing these decisions.
“Our case depends on the dependence that the Panama Joint Investment Team (JIT) Nawaz Sharif did not record assets to buy ladd pad in middle nanates, and it was under section 9 (a) (v) “, Muzaffar said,” The court recognized our basic context and punished the people of condemnation “.
Muzaffar said, regardless of this, it may be considered that in the case of the allegations and frauds filed under a piece of NAB Charge Charge Sheet section (A) (5) against Sharif, Muzaffar said Said, “Really, Nawaz Sharif was deported for Section 9 (a) and this charge.”
Contrary to Abyssi’s ideology, the present departments have held that four primary equipments should be demonstrated for the punishment under NARRR section 9 (a) (v).
The Supreme Court’s Supreme Court, Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, had decided against the NAB against Fahim ur Rehman (PhD 2011 Supreme Court 1144). Equality (R) Tariq Hussain Jilani and Justice (R) Mahmood Akhtar Shahid Siddiqui were also included.
Equity Khos had held that unusual ownership of any financial assets or property was not a crime without any person, but due to failing to represent foreign assets or property ownership, property shock and crime Provides
To consider this by the NAB prosecutor on this occasion, and to maintain its viewpoint, it is important to say that Nawaz Sharif did not accept the responsibility of the pad in his response under the supervision of the court. It has been presented that this pad has been obtained by his father, a remote discount from a name and in 2006, the child moved to Nawaz Sharif’s responsibility. In any case, without any evidence, Jet and NAB demanded that Nawaz Sharif purchased these pads in the middle of his middle and the convicted court has decided that Paid Nawaz Sharif had received it.
In any case, when news senior lawyer Akramam Chaudhary reached and said that in the case of Justice Khosa, the decision of NAB prosecutor and fixing was seen, however, he replied that if Justice Khosa was mistaken with property The decision to buy was not discussed for this situation, but still the Sharif family was not ready to give full details of the cash trail to buy these properties.
